NetShare should price routes by quality, fit, and trust. The more useful the node for enterprise demand, the more valuable that route becomes inside the system. This is the product distinction, not a visual pricing gimmick.
Healthy route history deserves stronger monetization than noisy or questionable supply.
Routes that remain available and consistent are more useful to the enterprise side.
City and country-fit supply becomes more valuable for location-sensitive demand.
Latency and session consistency influence eligibility, weight, and price bands.
NetShare should not look like a generic price grid copied from SaaS. Traffic, trust, and route quality are tied together, and pricing should reflect that linkage directly.
| Dimension | Static Proxy Marketplace | NetShare AI-Scheduled Model |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Mostly flat by pool or traffic bucket. | Adjusted by route cleanliness, stability, geography, and demand fit. |
| Allocation | Broad distribution with limited route intelligence. | Traffic share follows node scoring and request-level matching. |
| Risk | Often reactive and loosely separated from pricing. | Risk control actively influences route eligibility and value. |
| Contributor Economics | Little differentiation between strong and weak supply. | Higher-quality nodes can earn more and receive more qualifying traffic. |
| Enterprise View | Buy IP volume. | Buy managed routing fit across geography, trust, and performance. |
Understand local speed, delay, and public IP context before deeper onboarding.
Open BenchmarkJoin node-side participation and unlock stronger monetization opportunities.
View Contributor SideRouting intent, compliance, and access control are handled after entry.
View Enterprise Side